We should begin by understanding the kind of company that the wording of Law 8 of 2010, as amended by law 114 of 2013 and regulated by Executive Decree 199 of 2014, are referring to, according to the conditions to be met:
The decree 199 of 2014 introduced provisions not contained in the law, namely:
Once the above conditions have been fulfilled, the income tax of the real estate investment company fall on the registered holders of the participation shares, which corresponds to them under Articles 699 and 700 of the Tax Code rates. Previously, the real estate investment company was obliged to withhold 5% of the amount distributed, in anticipation of the income tax, and submit it to the National Treasury retained within 10 days of each distribution.
The tax benefit is on the retention of 5% of distributed profits and that "the taxpayer may elect to treat as final income tax payable on the amount distributed ".
To ease the fiscal sacrifice, said legal provision states that if in any fiscal period, the distribution is less than 90% of net income for the same period, "said real estate investment company is subject to the determination of taxable income provided for in Article 699 of this Code, "referring to the rate of income tax for legal entities of the Tax Code, but not meet the standards and other general provisions to determine their own taxable income.
The original standard for the topic under consideration (Law 8 of 2010) established a 20% withholding tax on amounts distributed under similar conditions and with the same benefit of the final income tax. The amendment produced by Law 114 of 2013 really benefited large real estate investors by reducing the withholding to 5% as the final income tax payable. Medium and small investors were forgotten and subject to pay income tax based on 25% income tax rule.
Dr. Juan Francisco Pardini.
Pardini & Asociados offers you the Guide to Doing Business in Panama 2023 completely FREE! Download here!Get it now